Nat Turner’s Revolt (1831)


On the evening of August 21–22, 1831, an enslaved preacher and self-styled prophet named Nat Turner launched the most deadly slave revolt in the history of the United States. Over the course of a day in Southampton County, Turner and his allies killed fifty-five white men, women, and children as the rebels made their way toward Jerusalem (now Courtland). Less than twenty-four hours after the revolt began, the rebels encountered organized resistance and were defeated in an encounter at James Parker’s farm. Following this setback, Turner and other rebels scrambled to reassemble their forces. The next day, a series of defeats led to the effective end of the revolt. White people quickly and brutally reasserted their control over Southampton County, killing roughly three dozen Black people without trials. Within a few days of the revolt, white leaders in Southampton became increasingly confident that the revolt had been suppressed and worked to limit the extralegal killing of Black people. Instead, white leaders made sure that the remaining suspected rebels were tried, which also meant that the white enslavers would receive compensation from the state for condemned enslaved people. Trials began on August 31, 1831, and the majority were completed within a month. Ultimately, thirty slaves and one free Black man were condemned to death. Of these, nineteen were executed and twelve had their sentences commuted by Governor John Floyd. Turner himself eluded capture throughout September and into October, when two enslaved men spotted him close to where the revolt began. Once detected, Turner was forced to move and was unable to elude the renewed manhunt. He was captured on October 30. While in jail awaiting trial, Turner spoke freely about the revolt. Local lawyer Thomas R. Gray approached Turner with a plan to take down his confessions. The Confessions of Nat Turner was published within weeks of the Turner’s execution on November 11, 1831, and remains an important source for historians. The revolt had important ramifications outside of Southampton, as southern communities feared additional revolts. In Richmond, Thomas Jefferson Randolph—the grandson of Thomas Jefferson—tried but failed to convince the General Assembly to enact a plan that would have put the state on the path to gradual emancipation. Abolitionists remembered the revolt as an important example of both enslaved people’s hatred for the system of slavery and their bravery. The cultural legacy of the revolt is still vibrant; the revolt remains the clearest example of overt resistance in the United States to the system of slavery.


Nat Turner's Bible

While the oppressive system of slavery provides the essential backdrop for the revolt, Nat Turner described his motivation for the Southampton slave revolt in religious terms. Little is known about Turner beyond what Thomas R. Gray published in The Confessions of Nat Turner. According to The Confessions, Turner was born into slavery on a Southampton plantation on October 2, 1800. He could read and write, which was unusual for an enslaved person of that time and place, and he owned a Bible. He had a family, including a grandmother to whom he was “much attached”; a father who escaped slavery; and a wife and son, who lived on a neighboring farm. He was deeply religious, “devoting [his] time to fasting and prayer,” and experienced private revelations in which “the Spirit that spoke to the prophets in former days” spoke to him. When he was in his twenties, Turner ran away from his overseer. He was gone for a month, returning only, he said, at the spirit’s urging.

In the late 1820s, his religious visions—which up to this point appeared to be apolitical or even counterrevolutionary—became more overtly political. On May 12, 1828, the spirit appeared to Turner and told him that “the time was fast approaching when the first should be last and the last should be first.” It also told him that there would be a sign, a prediction that Turner believed was fulfilled on February 12, 1831, when Southampton experienced a solar eclipse. While The Confessions describes Turner’s motivations in primarily religious terms, the historian David F. Allmendinger Jr. noted that the religious signs might not have been the only thing that led Turner to undertake the conspiracy. At this time, Turner lived on the farm of his enslaver, Joseph Travis; his son lived on a neighboring farm belonging to Piety Reese. In February 1831, just days before Turner approached his future conspirators, Reese’s son John W. signed a note that put Turner’s son up as collateral for a debt that he, Reese, had struggled to pay.

Nat Turner & His Confederates in Conference.

Inspired by a combination of religious, familial, and perhaps other unrecorded motives, Turner shared his idea of revolting with four other enslaved men in whom he “had the greatest confidence”—Henry, Hark, Nelson, and Sam. None of the four betrayed the plot, and all joined a conspiracy that they understood would likely cost them their lives. These men never had the chance to explain why they cast their lots with Turner. Many whites at the time of the revolt dismissed Turner’s followers as pawns “who acted under the influence of their leader,” as the Richmond Whig and Commercial Journal put it, but it is unclear how many—if any—were disciples of Turner. (The only person who was named as a religious follower in The Confessions was a white man, Etheldred Brantley, whom Turner baptized.) While Turner described the revolt in religious terms, the new conspirators appear to have seen the revolt in more political terms. When the conspirators selected a date to begin the revolt, initially they picked the Fourth of July.

As the five conspirators tried to turn Turner’s inspiration into a plan, they thought about the revolt strategically. Nothing was more important to the conspirators than to make sure that their plan went undetected. Turner and his men understood that “the negroes had frequently attempted similar things,” but because they “confided their purpose to several,” the news of the conspiracy “always leaked out.” Based upon this insight, the rebels decided to keep the revolt small, deciding not even to stockpile weapons. Instead, the conspirators accepted Turner’s strategy to “slay my enemies with their own weapons.” While this made the rebels less dangerous at the beginning of the revolt, it also decreased the chance that the conspiracy would be detected before the revolt began.

The Confessions of Nat Turner

Keeping the revolt small meant that whites would not uncover the conspiracy, but keeping it small created a new hurdle for the rebels: they had to figure out how to get enslaved people and free Blacks who had not heard about the revolt to join them. Turner recalled the conspirators thought hard about this problem—”Many were the plans formed and rejected by us,” he noted in The Confessions—but with little success. On July 4, 1831, the day the original conspirators initially agreed upon to begin the revolt, Turner “fell sick,” in part because he had little confidence that the rebels had a plan that would work.

Eventually, perhaps spurred on by a new sign from God—a solar event on August 13, 1831, where across the East Coast the sun appeared silver and then green—the conspirators settled on a plan that they hoped would lead enslaved people and free Blacks to rally to their banner: they would undertake a sudden strike and kill whites, including women and children, indiscriminately. Hearing about the rebels’ power and success, other enslavd people and free Blacks would join. When one potential recruit objected that there were too few rebels to begin a slave revolt, one of the original conspirators assured him that as the rebels “went on and killed the whites[,] the blacks would join them.” This was just the first stage of the revolt. According to The Confessions, once the rebels had formed and equipped a “sufficient force,” the indiscriminate killings of whites would end, and the revolt would continue albeit using more conventional methods of war.

The plan was clearly a long shot, as the rebels understood, but given the odds against them, the five conspirators were willing to stake their lives on it. On Saturday evening, August 20, Turner, Henry, and Hark made plans for a feast the following day for the men who had joined the revolt. When they gathered the next day, the original five conspirators had added two. After a feast and a trip to Joseph Travis’s cider press, the conspirators were ready to begin the revolt.

The Revolt

The revolt began on Sunday night, August 21, 1831, at Joseph Travis’s farm. During the night, the rebels caught the occupants of the farm completely by surprise and the sleeping white people were in no position to escape the small rebel force. At the same time, while the rebels were in their own neighborhood, they could recruit enslaved people that they knew to their cause. For example, at Travis’s home, the rebels recruited Austin, who despite living on the same small farm as Turner had not been included in the feast that the conspirators held during the day. At the same time, however, other enslaved people, even those with strong personal connections to the original conspirators, were hesitant to join the revolt. Hark’s brother-in-law Jack agreed to join only reluctantly. Others, including the free Black man named Emory Evans, who lived on Salathial Francis’s farm, refused to join at all. Over the course of the night, the rebels attacked three households, killing eight white people, including a sleeping infant at Travis’s.

As dawn approached on the morning of August 22, the rebels—then numbering about a dozen—changed their method of attack. During the night, they moved stealthily and attacked in silence; during the day, they moved quickly and boldly. At Elizabeth Turner’s, Austen shot Hartwell Peebles, the first time that any rebel used a gun to kill someone. During the morning, the rebels also separated into two squads: one on horseback and one traveling by foot. This allowed the group on horseback to launch more and faster strikes. These attacks were successful in terms of killing white people. At Catherine Whitehead’s plantation, for example, rebels killed all but one of the white residents—including Margaret Whitehead, the only person Turner killed—but the rebels continued to struggle to win supporters among enslaved people. Among Whitehead’s twenty-seven enslaved people, the rebels found, at most, a single recruit, and several of Catherine Whitehead’s enslaved people foiled the rebels’ efforts to kill Harriet Whitehead. At Newit Harris’s even larger plantation, the rebels failed to gain a single recruit. By late morning, it was clear that the rebels would not inspire a mass movement, as they had hoped. Nevertheless, at about forty enslaved people, the rebel army was a dangerous force.

By midmorning the challenge of recruiting was compounded by a new problem for the rebels: news about the revolt had spread, making it harder for the rebels to find white victims. Most white people who heard of the revolt immediately fled to the woods, eluding the rebel army. Others tried to create defensible positions. At Levi Waller’s farm, the site of a local school, word arrived of the insurrection, and Waller made the decision to gather the children together to defend them. This led to the most devastating raid of the revolt, as the rebels arrived after the children had congregated but before Waller could set up any defense. Waller’s wife and ten children died during that assault. By midday, when the rebels left Rebecca Vaughn’s house, they encountered no more defenseless white people. Arthur Vaughn was the last person killed by the rebel forces.

By the afternoon of August 22, 1831, the dynamic of the revolt had shifted in an important way. Turner and his men remained on the offensive, heading to Jerusalem where they hoped to “procure arms and ammunition,” but they were being pursued by several groups of white men who had organized to suppress the revolt. At James Parker’s farm, a group of whites led by Alexander P. Peete, who had been pursuing the rebels along the road toward Jerusalem, dispersed a small group of rebels who had remained by the gate while the other rebels went to Parker’s slave quarters to recruit. This white force then engaged the main rebel force at Parker’s farm. Peete and his men were driven from the field. The rebels pursued the fleeing men, but the pursuit led the rebels into an ambush set by other white men who had heard the sounds of fighting. Turner’s men were dispersed, and the rebels were turned back from their approach toward Jerusalem.

Following the defeat at Parker’s farm, the rebels spent the afternoon trying to regroup. By evening, when they made their camp at Thomas Ridley’s plantation, Turner had about forty men in arms. But the rebels were on edge. When sentries went out before dawn to investigate a potential attack, they found nothing, but their return set off a commotion in the rebels’ camp. Awake and ill at ease, the rebels who had not fled made their way to Samuel Blunt’s plantation, which they believed Blunt had abandoned. But Blunt and five others had set up a defense, and the rebels scattered. In the commotion following the encounter at Blunt’s, Turner lost contact with the other rebels, who broke up into ever-smaller groups, pursued by more and more white men. Although some rebels remained at large for days—and Turner himself would not be captured for more than two months—the revolt was effectively over by midday on August 23, a day and a half after it first began.


Reward for the Capture of Nat Turner

News of the revolt created fear among white people, many of whom left their houses to gather together in central places. One reporter noted, “Jerusalem was never so crowded from its foundation.” As the families gathered, paramilitary units were organized to put down the revolt and in many cases get revenge. In the days after the revolt, white people from Southampton and beyond killed about three dozen Black people without trial in Southampton County. At Catherine Whitehead’s, for example, a white unit from Greensville County was about to kill an enslaved man named Hubbard, when Harriet Whitehead stopped the execution by explaining that Hubbard had actually saved her life. White people also tortured suspected Black rebels, often by putting their feet in a fire. One white person recounted how one suspect nearly had his foot “burnt off” before his interrogators “found at last that he was innocent.” A newspaper editor admitted that the brutality was “hardly inferior in barbarity to the atrocities of the insurgents.”

The pattern of retribution and killing in the days after the revolt posed a serious threat to the Black community and to the county’s largest enslavers. After the revolt, anyone could freely kill an enslaved person and escape punishment by claiming that they thought that the enslaved person was a suspected rebel. To stop such indiscriminate killings, on August 28, 1831, General Richard Eppes, the leader of the state militia force in Southampton, issued an order calling for white people “to abstain in the future from any acts of violence to any personal property whatever”—in other words, enslaved men and women—”for any cause whatever.” Those who disobeyed this order would be subject to “the rigors of the articles of war.” The effort to stop extralegal killings was largely successful and meant that thereafter, most enslaved people who were suspected of supporting the rebels were tried in court.

Slaves Executed for the Nat Turner Revolt

The trials of suspected enslaved rebels began on August 31, 1831. The trials were held in courts of oyer and terminer, which meant that the suspects were tried without a jury before a panel of slaveholding judges. Accused rebels each had paid appointed defense attorneys, and the judges made an effort to ensure that the trials were not show trials. The court demanded properly drawn charges—it dismissed a case where the prosecutor had not properly drawn his charges—and required that the prosecutor present some credible evidence that the accused were guilty of a crime. In many of these cases, these formal hurdles posed no problem for the prosecutor, Meriwether Broadnax, who was able to secure thirty convictions against accused enslaved people. Every one of the convictions led to a death sentence, although in twelve of these cases, the court found some extenuating circumstance—such as youth, lack of substantive involvement in the revolt, or reluctance to join the conspirators—to recommend that Governor John Floyd commute the death sentence to sale from the state of Virginia.

The governor followed the recommendations of the court in every case the court provided a unanimous recommendation, although he was inclined, but unable, to commute the sentence of Lucy, the one woman convicted for a role in the revolt. In the one case where a split court recommended commutation, Floyd sided with the minority and allowed the execution to proceed. The judges also examined five free Blacks. Four were remanded until the next meeting of the Superior Court of Chancery, where three would be acquitted. One, Barry Newsom, was convicted and, on May 11, 1832, became the last of nineteen people executed in Southampton County for their role in the revolt.

Discovery of Nat Turner

Turner himself remained at large while the trials and executions were ongoing. For nearly two months, he evaded capture, until a dog happened upon his hideout and found some meat. The dog returned a few nights later, accompanied by two Black people who were out hunting. When Turner revealed himself to them, he pleaded for them to keep his hiding place secret, but they ran away. Realizing that “they would betray me,” Turner fled from his hiding place. When the manhunt was resumed near where the revolt began, Benjamin Phipps finally captured Turner on October 30, 1831. Turner was brought to Jerusalem the next day, where he was examined by James Trezvant and James W. Parker, two of the most prominent political figures in Southampton County. The examination lasted more than an hour and witnesses found Turner “quite communicative.” Turner’s willingness “to answer any questions” created an opportunity for Thomas R. Gray, a young ne’er-do-well attorney, who offered to publish Turner’s confession. Turner agreed. Gray met with Turner over a series of three days and took down Turner’s confessions. Trezvant may have read a draft of the confession at Turner’s trial on November 5, 1831. Gray took the final version of The Confessions of Nat Turner to Washington, D.C., to register it for copyright, something that was done even before Turner was executed on November 11, 1831. The Confessions of Nat Turner was published by the end of November 1831.

William Preston

Outside of Southampton County, the revolt had important repercussions. White enslavers in nearby Virginia and North Carolina worried that the plot extended beyond Southampton. This led to both extralegal and legal retribution against Black people suspected to have been privy to the plot. Elsewhere in the South, most notably in and around Wilmington, North Carolina, fears of slave insurrections led to terrible panics and brutal reprisals against local Blacks. Because the revolt reminded white people about the dangers of enslaving larges numbers of Black people, roughly 2,000 Virginians petitioned the state legislature to do something about slavery. A committee charged with considering the petitions reported that it was “inexpedient” for the General Assembly to pass any laws that would end slavery in Virginia. Delegate William Preston offered an amendment that replaced “inexpedient” with “expedient,” but the reformers lost this vote, marking the last time that the Virginia legislature would consider a movement away from slavery until the end of the American Civil War (1861–1865). Instead, the legislature passed a series of restrictions aimed at further suppressing Black religion and limiting the rights of free Blacks.


The Confessions of Nat Turner

Nat Turner’s Revolt has been an important part of the cultural landscape in the United States. In the Cooper’s Union Address, Republican presidential candidate Abraham Lincoln reminded his New York audience of what he called the Southampton Insurrection, suggesting that slavery revolts were a threat before John Brown or the rise of the Republican Party. The abolitionist Thomas Wentworth Higginson wrote a history of the revolt that appeared in the Atlantic Monthly in the first months of the Civil War. In the twentieth century, the historian Herbert Aptheker wrote about the revolt and myriad other episodes of slave resistance as a way to combat the common perception that enslaved people were content in the antebellum South. Aptheker’s most important work, American Negro Slave Revolts (1943), was panned by many historians of his era, but this work on Southampton nonetheless prepared the ground for a revisionist understanding of slavery as an oppressive system that enslaved people actively resisted. In 1967, the novelist William Styron gave the revolt a broader audience when he wrote a best-selling novel based upon The Confessions of Nat Turner published by Thomas R. Gray. The book won critical praise—including a Pulitzer Prize for fiction—but it also engendered strong protest from Black activists who objected to the way that Styron, a white man, had portrayed the leader of the revolt. In 2016, Virginia native Nate Parker released the movie Birth of a Nation, which dramatized the story of the revolt.

October 2, 1800
Nat Turner is born into slavery in Southampton County.
February 1831
John W. Reese signs a note that puts Nat Turner's son up as collateral for a debt that Reese had struggled to pay.
February 12, 1831
Virginia witnesses a solar eclipse and Nat Turner interprets it as a sign from God to share with four other men his idea to revolt.
July 4, 1831
Nat Turner postpones the revolt he and four other enslaved men had planned for that day.
August 13, 1831
A solar event occurs in Virginia in which the sun appears to have a greenish hue; Nat Turner interprets the event as a sign from God to launch his revolt.
August 21—22, 1831
Nat Turner, an enslaved preacher and self-styled prophet, leads the deadliest revolt of enslaved people in Virginia's history.
August 28, 1831
To stop the indiscriminate killings of suspected enslaved rebels, General Richard Eppes, the leader of the state militia force in Southampton, proclaims martial law.
August 31, 1831
In the wake of Nat Turner's Revolt, the trials of suspected enslaved rebels begin.
September 4, 1831—May 11, 1832
Eighteen enslaved men and women and one free black man convicted of participating in Nat Turner's Revolt are hanged in Southampton County.
October 30, 1831
Nat Turner is captured near where the revolt he led began.
October 31, 1831
James Trezvant and James W. Parker examine Nat Turner and commit him to the Southampton County jail.
November 1, 1831
The lawyer Thomas R. Gray meets with Nat Turner, accused of leading a slave revolt, in the Southampton County jail.
November 5, 1831
Nat Turner is convicted and sentenced to death for leading a revolt of enslaved people.
November 10, 1831
Thomas R. Gray secures a copyright for his pamphlet The Confessions of Nat Turner, as fully and voluntarily made to Thomas R. Gray. Gray's account purports to tell the story of Nat Turner's slave uprising in the words of Turner himself.
November 11, 1831
Nat Turner is hanged.
    Further Reading

  • Allmendinger Jr., David F. Nat Turner and the Rising in Southampton County. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.
  • Aptheker, Herbert. American Negro Slave Revolts. New York: Columbia University, 1943.
  • Breen, Patrick H. The Land Shall Be Deluged with Blood: A New History of the Nat Turner Revolt. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.
  • Drewry, William Sidney. The Southampton Insurrection. Washington, D.C.: 1900.
  • French, Scot. The Rebellious Slave: Nat Turner in American Memory. Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin, 2004.
  • Gray, Thomas R. The Confessions of Nat Turner.Baltimore, Maryland: 1831.
  • Greenberg, Kenneth S., ed. Nat Turner: A Slave Rebellion in History and Memory. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
  • Higginson, Thomas Wentworth. “Nat Turner’s Insurrection,” The Atlantic Monthly, August 1861.
  • Oates, Stephen. The Fires of Jubilee: Nat Turner’s Fierce Rebellion. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.
  • Roth, Sarah N. “The Nat Turner Project.” Widener University. http://www.natturnerproject.org.
  • Styron, William. The Confessions of Nat Turner. New York: Random House, 1967.
APA Citation:
Breen, Patrick. Nat Turner’s Revolt (1831). (2020, December 07). In Encyclopedia Virginia. https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/turners-revolt-nat-1831.
MLA Citation:
Breen, Patrick. "Nat Turner’s Revolt (1831)" Encyclopedia Virginia. Virginia Humanities, (07 Dec. 2020). Web. 17 Jul. 2024
Last updated: 2023, November 14
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.