The Founding and Early Years
The Bodleian Plate
The construction of the college’s main building in 1695 (later the Wren Building) involved forced labor. Though skilled masons were brought from England, the hard labor was done by enslaved workers owned by the contractor. Two other enslaved men were leased from, an and the college’s powerful president for life. Enslaved workers also built the Brafferton, a house originally used as a school for (1723), and the President’s House (1732), both of which still stand, as well as structures long gone, including privies, a , and an observatory.
The first documented enslaved person at the College of William and Mary appeared in an affidavit by James Blair dated May 1, 1704. It mentions “a Negro man” owned by Blair and ordered by him in 1702 to break down a locked door; Blair’s wife’s “maid, who lay in a Closet just by” may also have been enslaved. The first enslaved person known to be owned by the college was a man named Price, a gift in 1704 from Governorand valued at £30. Price was followed over the decades by an unknown number of others, most of them recorded only in lost documents. Some of these enslaved people were leased; others are present in the surviving bursar’s books behind shadowy entries for medical, , and shoe expenses. Most people were not named: “paid hire a Negro Wench 2 years”; “paid Mr Allen hire of a Negro.” Entries also record expenses for several coffins (a burial ground for enslaved laborers has yet to be discovered) and even for purchases of hops, pork, beef, mutton, and butter from enslaved workers at the Nottoway Quarter, a working plantation acquired by the college in 1718 for £150. For an additional £476 the college purchased seventeen enslaved people who worked 2,119 acres of tobacco. The farm’s profits paid for scholarships, known as Nottoway Foundations, for less wealthy students.
On February 27, 1729, James Blair and Stephen Fouace, the last surviving member of the original board of visitors, formally transferred governing authority of the college from the original founders to the president and masters, or members of the faculty. Included in the transfer were “all the negro slaves by the said trustees, from time to time purchased, now living upon the said lands or any part of them or parcel thereof and their increase.”
Enslaved people from early on lived where they worked: throughout the college’s main building, as well as in the President’s House, the Brafferton, and kitchens. In The Present State of Virginia (1724), Hugh Jones, a master at the college from 1717 to 1721, wrote that the difficulties in controlling students were exacerbated by “the many Servants lodged in the College and the several Doors and Ways to get out of it.” He argued that the need for a separate slave quarter was compelling. “There [is] a very great Occasion for a Quarter for the Negroes and inferior servants belonging to the College,” he wrote, “for these not only take up a great deal of Room and are noisy and nasty, but also have often made me and others apprehensive of the great Danger of being burnt with the College, thro’ their Carelessness and Drowsiness.” At least one slave quarter was eventually built, but it is not known where or when. A map of the Williamsburg area made in 1782 by the French cartographer Jean-Nicholas Desandrouins shows structures close to the gardens and orchards west of the college that may have been quarters. Other buildings, such as kitchens, also served as slave quarters.
is the only surviving catalog of men, women, and children enslaved by the College of William and Mary and dates from about 1780. The one-page document includes the names “Winkfield, Daniell, Dick—almost a invalid, Pompey, Adam, Nedd, old Lucy—a invalid, old Kate a invalid, Nanny a invalid, Effy—not much better.” It also includes people enslaved by the college but hired out for income: “Lemon, James, Letty, Charlott, Frankey, Betty and two Gerrels,” plus “Mr. Bellini’s three, Molly, Mass, and Lucy.” Some others are named in college minutes, where, for example, on December 24, 1778, the president and masters “Resolved, That a Negro Man called Nero be purchased of Dr Jas Carter, & that the President be desired to make the purchase for any sum not exceeding 500 £.”
Only a few details are known about any of men, women, and children enslaved by or at William and Mary. In 1777, the college prepared to lease or sell the Nottoway Quarter. The minutes of a meeting of the president and masters, dated December 29, 1777, direct that “all the Negroes, stock & Utensils” also were to be sold, while “two Negro Fellows & a boy [were to] be ordered down from the Nottoway Quarter, to supply the place of Hirelings in the College.” Thein the Virginia Gazette, published on November 28, 1777, specified that “about thirty likely [i.e., capable or strong] Negroes” were on offer “for ready Money.” On December 29, 1779, the president and masters resolved that “Winkfield, Bob, Lemon, Adam, & Pompey be retained for cleaning the College & other necessary Purposes.” A , published in the Virginia Gazette on November 30, 1775, addressed Winkfield as the “Superintendent of the hall of William and Mary College”: “No one, of your colour, has ever established a more respectable character than yourself … You have ever been distinguished for your spirit and candour.” Jottings on a preserved copy of the paper describe Winkfield as the son of “old Liverpool, the Ferryman.”
Lemon shows up in the bursar’s accounts more than others—selling produce to the college and receiving a Christmas bonus in 1808, a food allowance in 1815, medicine in 1816, and, in 1817, a coffin. “Old Lemon, one of the slaves then belonging to the college,” appears in‘s antislavery novel The Valley of Shenandoah (1824), helping the protagonist move in as a student at the college and fetching his mail; he is recalled especially for his oyster dinners, another sign of his entrepreneurship. And he is evoked in a as, perhaps, the namesake for what appears to be a team or group of students competing in an obscure way with other groups.
Under financial pressure during the American Revolution, the Reverend James Madison, who served as president of the College of William and Mary from 1777 to 1812, cut back on services provided by the school to students while outsourcing others. He hired out the enslaved people the college owned. On December 18, 1779, the collegein the Virginia Gazette that, among other things, “commons,” or the serving of meals,” shall cease at the College. The President and Professors shall allow to some sober and discreet male person, the use of the college kitchen and garden. They shall also hire to him the negroes accustomed to labour in the same, taking bond with security.” College leaders explained that “a sufficient number of slaves shall be reserved for cleaning the college,” and any others that remained “shall be hired out at publick auction.”
In the minutes of their December 14, 1780, meeting, the president and masters resolved that the men, women, and children enslaved at Nottoway Quarter be sold, “disposed of in Exchange for Lands” within a hundred miles of Williamsburg. A few weeks later, on January 1, 1781, the steward was directed “to hire out the Negroes belonging to ye College, except those necessary for ye College, & [adjoining] Farm, ye Persons hiring them to pay their Taxes & clothe them.”
During the war the Britishto those enslaved men who joined its army, prompting the Reverend Madison to write his brother, William Madison, on July 21, 1781, that “the College is entirely broke up … It is particularly necessary to move the few Negroes we have, as I know nothing but a lucky accident prevented most of them from joining the enemy.” After the war and in light of serious damages to the college, the president and masters resolved, in September 1782, “that so many of the Negroes not employed about the College be Sold to defray the Expense of repairing the Buildings.”
Lives and Duties
The College of William and Mary owned few enslaved people at any one time, perhaps, early in the nineteenth century, as few as five, often hiring enslaved labor from townspeople instead. Scholars have been able to place names to only about sixty enslaved people who labored at the college, with seventeen of those coming from baptismal records at Bruton Parish Church. Overseen by the mistress of the college (a hired white woman) and later the steward, these men, women, and children attended to the domestic needs of the institution and its inhabitants—cooking, cleaning, mending, washing, and attending the sick. At its October 24, 1716, meeting, the board of visitors ordered that its housekeeper, Mrs. Barrett, be provided with “a servant to Shutt the Gates, ring the bell, and to help to clean the house.” A later mistress of the college was directed, on February 9, 1763, to remain as much as possible on campus, “as we all know that Negroes will not perform their Duties without the Mistress’s constant Eye especially in so large a Family as the College.” On August 28, 1769, college leaders resolved that an enslaved boy “be appointed to go into the Town on errands from the young gentlemen between the hours of eight & twelve o’clock in the morning, and at no other time.”
In August 1768, the president was empowered “to hire two Negroes … for Cutting and Carting Wood on the College Lands for the Use of the said College.” In 1779, the College steward and gardener was to be assisted by “two men & a boy.” Faculty resolutions in 1837 directed that “Joe the College servant … cut four cords of wood weekly during the recess, and that Mr. Pryor the constable be employed to measure such wood and see that this order is fulfilled.” Joe was also to “whitewash and clean the College chambers and Lecture rooms.” Some wealthier students in the eighteenth century brought their own “servants” to attend to their needs, eight in 1754 alone; a college regulation, published in 1727, required “That the masters and Scholars keeping waiting Boys pay Five Pounds per Annum for their Board.”
A series of accusations and depositions swirling around a housekeeper named Maria Digges offers a glimpse of life for enslaved people at that time. On May 27, 1775, a group of students and ushers, or assistant teachers, brought a complaint to the president and masters against Digges. She was accused of a number of offenses, including a capricious “Power over the Domesticks.” According to the testimony of one student, this meant that “Servants cannot be had to clean his Rooms: in particular a Boy was wanting last Summer.” Another complained that he had “wanted a Servant to go down Town, & been unable to get one.” Digges also was accused of having “intrusted the Keys of the Store Room to the Slaves to which they have been seen to have free Ingress & Egress.” A witness added that he had “sometimes seen the Servants without any white person with them.” A member of the faculty countered that “Negroes are not often entrusted with the Keys of the Store room, and the College has received no loss on that account.” The college nurse affirmed that “Miss Digges’ servant … never went into the Store-room unattended by a white Person, except once.”
In absolving Digges, the president and masters drew attention to the head usher, James Innis, and his mistreatment of enslaved people. In particular, they noted “his Beating & Punishing the Negroes of the College when he thinks them in fault which has encourag’d the Students to do the same, and which tends to transfer the Command of the said Negroes from the President and Masters to the Ushers & Students to the Interruption of the Business of the College.” Later that year, on November 1, 1775, a meeting of the president and masters noted a “run of ill treatment which has of late been bestow’d by the Boys upon the Servants of the College both Male & Female,” who, it was claimed, were not acting appropriately subordinate.
Several years earlier, on November 16, 1769, the president and masters heard a complaint against John Byrd. “After calling for a servant employ’d by the House keeper,” Byrd appeared “with a Horsewhip in his hand and taking hold of his Servant, with his whip lifted up threaten’d to whip him if he did not immediately go with him.” The housekeeper intervened and was herself threatened. When the case went to a hearing, Byrd insulted the president and masters and finally was admonished as much for that as “for disobedience of their order and ill treatment of their Servant.” On July 30, 1776, the president and masters ordered “that if any of the Servants in College presume to behave amiss to the Housekeeper or the Students,” an application could be made to an administrator, “who [may] direct such punishment as he thinks the crime deserves.”
Efforts at monitoring and controlling the behavior of enslaved people and how they were treated continued into the nineteenth century. In the 1830s, slaves were prohibited from entering the college at night except under special circumstances. In 1849, the Laws and Regulations of the College of William and Mary specified that “the Faculty shall hire as many servants as may be necessary, to ring the bell, keep the passages, stairs, recitation rooms, and rooms of students in good order; to wait on the students, and assist the Professor of Chemistry and Natural Philosophy in his experiments.” Students were prohibited from calling on enslaved people for special services, unless sick and requiring a meal.
Issue of Slavery at the College
From 1760, several early presidents helped to organize and oversee a school for the religious education of free and enslaved black children; the school was funded by a London charity, the, and was affiliated with the college on the recommendation of Benjamin Franklin. It was initially overseen by the college’s president, the Reverend , and the printer . A skilled teacher, Ann Wager, the tenets of Christianity.
Intellectual skepticism about slavery pervaded the college from the 1760s into the early nineteenth century, a skepticism thatencountered as a student from 1760 to 1762 and which he admired and encouraged. While a law professor at the college (1780–1789), taught against slavery. His successor, , published (1796), a plan to gradually abolish slavery in Virginia that was largely ignored. The college’s graduates included such abolitionists as and William Short. noted that most of his classmates, from 1804 to 1805, left William and Mary “in favor of the gradual abolition of slavery.”
Adam Empie, who served as president from 1827 to 1836, opposed slavery. An Anglican minister from New York, he upset some Virginians by ministering to blacks and officiating their weddings at Bruton Parish Church, a dispute that contributed to his resignation in 1836. Slavery did not end at the College of William and Mary during his tenure, however, and he benefited from the services of enslaved people, including those he hired himself.
Empie’s successor was, a professor of political law at the college who, in 1832, after , wrote a commentary on the in the General Assembly over whether to abolish slavery. He made a case against emancipation, arguing that although slavery violated the spirit of Christianity, it was instituted by God. It but ultimately benefited black people by exposing them to a more a civilized way of life. Dew ruled out even gradual emancipation because, he wrote, blacks were “entirely unfit for a state of freedom among the whites.”
Student Humor Magazine at the College of William and Mary
The College of William and Mary’s dependence on enslaved labor ended in May 1861 whennecessitated classes being suspended. Not long afterward, the president of the college, Benjamin S. Ewell, an engineer trained at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, New York, was named commandant of the region. He issued a general order of , to force into service the college’s and other and to build a series of redoubts against a toward .
The college’s grappling with its involvement with slavery has varied in the years since the Civil War. After the war and well into the twentieth century, faculty and presidents tended toward either silence and denial or a sentimentalizing of slavery in line with theview of the Civil War. In the twenty-first century, however, the College of William and Mary has faced its history of enslavement directly, beginning in 2007 and 2008, when the Student and Faculty Assemblies passed resolutions challenging the college to investigate the institution’s past ownership of slaves and practice of Jim Crow discrimination. In 2009, the board of visitors acknowledged that the school had “owned and exploited slave labor from its founding to the Civil War; and that it had failed to take a stand against segregation during the Jim Crow Era.” The board also supported the establishment of the Lemon Project: A Journey of Reconciliation, charged with documenting the college’s complicity with slavery and its aftereffects. It was named for Lemon, the enslaved man who labored at the College of William and Mary from December 1779 until his death in 1817. In 2018, the visitors formally apologized, and the college moved to memorialize those it exploited during its first 168 years.